Unfortunately, the listing you're looking for is no longer available.
Similar Listings
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Land Court Department
Trial Court
BARNSTABLE, SS. CASE NO. 24 MISC 000502 (GHP)
Town of Yarmouth
v.
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River, a Corporation Sole, et al.
TO: Jonathan Hallett, Jonathan Hallett, Jr, Ezekiel Hallett, and Andrews Hallett, all deceased, and all formerly of Yarmouth, Barnstable County, and said Commonwealth and their unknown heirs, devisees, or legal representatives; Morgan Powell Craighead, Dennis W. Craighead, Raymond D. Craighead, Elaine M. Speakman, Deborah A. Speakman, James W. Speakman, Joseph D. Speakman, Claudia G. Sidener, Glen L. Duncan, Donald W. Craighead, Daniel W. Craighead, and Kenneth R. Craighead, all now or formerly of San Francisco County, CA; Gary Arthur Martin, John Anthony Martin, Charles Daryl Martin, and Bonnie A. Craighead, all now or formerly of Los Angeles County, CA; Dennis Wayne Bass, Parris R. Smith, and Beth Jenner, all now or formerly of San Diego County, CA; Ruth McClure, James K. Moore, John A. Moore, Mary Kay Moore, David Bruce Homan, Susan E. Homan, and Tim Nielsen, all now or formerly of Omaha, NE; Roger A. Hallett, Susan J. Ibach, Peggy Ann Ibach, Judy Lynne Ibach, and Cindy L. Ibach, all now or formerly of Seattle, WA; Judith Verlene Homan and Michael E Homan, both now or formerly of Cheyenne, WY;
and all other persons interested:
You are hereby notified that a complaint has been filed by the above-named plaintiff in which you are named as an interested party. This complaint concerns ten parcels of land located in Yarmouth, Barnstable County, and said Commonwealth depicted on a plan entitled "Plan of Land in West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, for John T. Wiggin, Scale 1' = 60', July 1, 1986, Thomas D. Kelley, Professional Land Surveyor", and recorded with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 420, Page 59. The Town of Yarmouth ("Town") is the current putative record owner of the Property by deed dated October 5, 2023 and recorded with the Registry in Book 36123, Page 55. The Town alleges that in the late 1960s a prior record owner took title to the Property as grantee of the several lots it comprises, attaining his ownership of the Property through several deeds from various grantors acting as successors, heirs, or legal representatives of Andrews Hallett and Ezekiel Hallett. The Town contends none of the Hallett deeds identify the source of the grantors' title to the parcels they conveyed. The Town now seeks a judgment settling title to the land. Alternatively, the Town asserts a claim for adverse possession of the Property, claiming that the judicial establishment of adverse possession would place title exclusively in the Town.
This complaint may be examined at the Land Court, Boston, Massachusetts, or online at www.masscourts.org. Information on how to search Land Court dockets is available on the Land Court website: www.mass.gov/how-to/find-a-land-court-case-docket. A copy of said complaint may also be obtained from plaintiff's attorney.
If you intend to make any defense, you are hereby required to serve upon the plaintiff's attorney, Per C. Vaage, Esq., Mead, Talerman & Costa, LLC, 730 Main Street, Suite 1F, Millis, MA 02054, an answer to the complaint on or before the ninth day of March, 2026, next, the return day, hereof, and a copy thereof must be filed in this court on or before said day.
If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for relief demanded in the complaint. Unless otherwise provided by Rule 13(a), your answer must state as a counterclaim any claim which you may have against the plaintiff which arise out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiffs' claim, or you will thereafter be barred from making such claim in any other action.
It is ORDERED that notice be given by publishing a copy of this notice once, at least thirty days before the ninth day of March, 2026, in the following newspapers: (1) the Cape Cod Times, a newspaper of general circulation in Barnstable County; (2) the San Francisco Chronicle, a daily newspaper published in San Francisco, CA; (3) the Los Angeles Times, a daily newspaper published in Los Angeles, CA; (4) the San Diego Union Tribune, a daily newspaper published in San Diego, CA; (5) the Omaha World-Herald, a daily newspaper published in Omaha, NE; (6) the Seattle Times, a daily newspaper published in Seattle, WA; and (7) the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle, a daily newspaper published in Cheyenne, WY.
Witness, Gordon H. Piper, Chief Justice of the Land Court, the thirteenth day of January, 2026.
Attest:
/s/ Deborah J. Patterson
Deborah J. Patterson
Recorder Show more »
District and Sessions Judge, South, Saket
IN THE COURT OF SH. POORAN CHAND
District Judge-05,South District, Saket Court Complex
PROCLAMATION REQUIRING ATTENDANCE OF DEFENDANT
(Order 5, Rule 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure)
MCA DJ/15/2025
PADMA TULSI AND ORS (SR. CITIZEN) Vs N.SUGUNAVATHI AND ORS
NEXTDATE: 28.02.2026
(1) RALPH S. RAO @ NANDAGIRI SRIÑIVAS RAO RESPONDENT No. 2 RIO 1MORRO CV. VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA:94590, USA
(2) SMT.APARNANARYANKULKARNI RESPONDENT NO. 3 R/O 50 BLOSSOM, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA-92620-4815, USA
WHEREAS you are intentionally evading service of summons it is hereby notified that if you shall not defend the case on the 28.02.2026 at 10.00 am the day fixed for the final disposal, it will be heard and determined ex-parte.
Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, on 20.12.2026 Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the Public Transit Revenue Measure District for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026, general election ballot a measure to prevent catastrophic service cuts to Bay Area public transit systems and to provide for road repairs, thereby preserving critical transportation systems that residents depend on every day to get to and from work, school, doctor's appointments, grocery shopping, and social activities.
A statement of the reasons for the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
The Bay Area's public transit network is the backbone of the region's economy and communities, connecting residents and visitors to job sites, businesses, schools and universities, health care, recreation, and various other services and life activities. However, public transit systems are experiencing severe financial pressures as federal and state funding is expiring. Without new sources of funding, transit agencies will be required to significantly reduce services including elimination of entire lines, closure of stations, reductions in service frequency, contraction of service hours and elimination of service on weekends.
In order to prevent such devastating cuts, this measure will impose a temporary sales and use tax of 0.5% in the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara, and 1% in the City and County of San Francisco, which is expected to generate approximately $980 million annually that will support BART, San Francisco Muni, Caltrain, AC Transit, VTA, Golden Gate Transit, San Francisco Bay Ferry, road repair and repaving, Clipper START and other reduced-fare programs, and improved disability access programs, all in the five Bay Area counties.
Funds generated by this measure will be subject to strict oversight and accountability requirements, including financial efficiency reviews and oversight by an independent committee to ensure all revenues are spent on their intended purposes. Funds may be withheld from specified transit agencies that do not meet certain standards of safety, cleanliness, service, and other standards.
/s/ /s/
Emily Loper Lian Chang
Proponents of the Initiative Show more »