NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to improve accountability within the executive branch and allow the Mayor to reorganize certain functions among city departments.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
San Francisco's Charter now spans 548 pages, making it the longest of any major American city. More than 90 percent of City departments are embedded in the Charter itself, meaning even modest organizational improvements require voter approval. Department heads oversee 99 percent of City staff and resources, yet the Mayor has direct hire-and-removal authority over only a small fraction of them. In recent instances involving serious ethical lapses, the Mayor lacked authority to immediately remove department heads. The Charter also requires the Mayor to directly supervise nearly 50 department heads—an impractical structure for a government with more than 30,000 employees. This structure diffuses responsibility and makes it difficult for voters to know who is accountable when services fall short.
The proposed measure restores clear lines of accountability within the executive branch while preserving oversight by the Board of Supervisors. These changes ensure that when San Franciscans elect a Mayor, they know who is responsible for delivering results.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
CHANGES TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH MANAGEMENT
The Way It Is Now
The Mayor is the chief executive officer of the City and is responsible for oversight of all departments and governmental units in the executive branch, which includes most City departments.
The Mayor has authority to transfer functions and reorganize executive branch departments created by ordinance, subject to rejection by the Board of Supervisors. The Mayor may not transfer functions or reorganize department powers and duties established in the City's Charter. Those functions, powers, and duties may be changed only by an amendment to the Charter approved by the voters.
The Mayor may not hire deputy mayors who supervise most departments created in the Charter.
When a department operates under a board or commission established in the Charter, the Mayor typically must select a department head from a list of candidates recommended by the board or commission. For most of those departments, the board or commission may fire the department head but the Mayor may not.
The Mayor, Board of Supervisors, and other elected officials have authority to appoint certain members to the boards and commissions established in the Charter. In most cases, an appointed member may only be suspended or removed for cause, after a process to determine that the member engaged in official misconduct or committed a felony involving moral turpitude.
The Proposal
The proposed measure would allow the Mayor to reorganize executive branch departments that exist under the Charter, with certain exceptions. The Mayor could transfer powers and duties set forth in the Charter, consolidate one or more departments together under a single department head, and assign the oversight of transferred functions to a different commission. The Mayor could not reorganize the functions assigned to the following departments: the City Administrator, Controller, Board of Appeals, Port, Airport, Asian Art Museum, Fine Art Museums, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Public Utilities Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Human Resources, Retirement Board, Health Service System, Department of Elections, Ethics Commission, or departments headed by other elected officials. The duties of the Department of Police Accountability could not be transferred to the Police Department, nor could the duties of the Sheriff's Inspector General be transferred to the Sheriff.
The proposed measure would allow the Mayor to hire deputy mayors.
The proposed measure would expand the Mayor's authority to hire certain department heads without board or commission involvement, and would authorize the Mayor to fire most department heads without board or commission involvement.
The proposed measure would authorize appointing authorities to remove their appointees to most boards and commissions without cause. The following boards and commissions would not be impacted by this change: Board of Appeals, Civil Service Commission, and Ethics Commission. Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to reform how measures are placed on the ballot in San Francisco.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
The proposed measure reforms how measures are placed on the ballot in San Francisco to better align with the standards in other California cities. San Francisco's ballot qualification rules are far looser than those of any other major California city. The result is bloated and confusing ballots. In November 2024, voters faced 15 separate measures, compared to one in San Jose and three in Oakland.
Over the past 30 years, 74 percent of ordinances on the ballot were placed before voters by a minority of supervisors, the Mayor, or through signature drives rather than through a transparent and accountable legislative process. 44 percent did not legally require voter approval.
San Francisco is the only major city that allows a minority of supervisors to place measures directly on the ballot. It also has by far the lowest signature threshold in California—just 2 percent of registered voters. Additionally, it is the only city that allows the mayor to unliterally place measures on the ballot. Together, the status quo incentivizes special interests and politicians to weaponize the system against each other. Measures are often filled with complicated legal jargon meant to confuse voters. So-called poison pill ballot measures are more and more common, and measures can mislead voters or lead to unintended consequences. In 2022, for example, a ballot measure intended to tax Amazon was later discovered to unintentionally tax hundreds of small businesses and could only be removed through court action, despite conflicting with the drafters' intentions.
The proposed measure aligns San Francisco more closely with other California cities while preserving voters' ability to participate directly in lawmaking. These commonsense reforms encourage coalition-building, deliberation, and higher-quality measures for voters to consider while reducing confusion and unintended consequences.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
CHANGES TO BALLOT MEASURE PROCESS
The Way It Is Now
Under the City Charter, an ordinance or declaration of policy (measure) may be placed on the ballot in several ways, including:
• By a six-member majority vote of the Board of Supervisors (Board);
• By four or more members of the Board submitting the measure without a vote of the Board;
• By the Mayor submitting the measure without a vote of the Board; or
• By registered voters submitting an initiative petition to the Department of Elections (signature initiative) containing signatures of at least 2% of the registered voters in San Francisco, which currently is approximately 10,600 signatures.
A signature initiative generally appears on the ballot at the next regularly scheduled municipal or statewide election. Signature initiatives that propose an ordinance may call for an earlier election, known as a special election, if the petition contains signatures of voters equal in number to at least 10% of the votes cast for all candidates for Mayor in the last mayoral election. The threshold for a signature initiative to call a special election currently is approximately 39,000 signatures.
Once a signature initiative is submitted to the Department of Elections, it cannot be withdrawn.
The Proposal
The proposal would amend the Charter to eliminate the ability of the Mayor or four or more members of the Board to place a measure on the ballot without a vote of the Board. The Board could still place measures on the ballot by a six-member majority vote.
The proposal would change the way the voters may place a signature initiative on the ballot by increasing the required number of voter signatures to 8% of the registered voters in San Francisco, or approximately 42,500 signatures. The proposed measure would also increase the required number of voter signatures to call a special election on an initiative ordinance to 10% of the registered voters in San Francisco (instead of 10% of votes cast for all candidates for Mayor in the last mayoral election), or approximately 53,100 signatures.
The proposal would allow the proponents of a signature initiative to withdraw the signature initiative from the ballot up to 102 days before the election. Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to make City contracting more efficient and professional by centralizing contracting oversight with the City Administrator, and giving the City Administrator authority to set citywide standards while preserving appropriate safeguards.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
San Francisco's contracting system has become overly complex, politicized, and inefficient. The status quo rewards insiders and special interests, and, at its worst, it breeds corruption. Over $5 billion in annual contracts are governed by a maze of rules scattered across more than 100 sections of code. "Procurement" and "contracting" appear more than 9,000 times in City law, and the Board of Supervisors has adopted 21 procurement-related ordinances in the last five years alone.
The result is a system so complicated that the City has created 39 waivers just to allow essential purchases to move forward. It costs roughly $25,000 to conduct a single procurement process—even if the total value of the contract itself is only $25,000—and many contracts take six to twelve months to complete. More than 14 departments can be involved in approving a single contract. In extreme cases, overlapping approvals and layered rules have driven up costs dramatically, as illustrated by the widely cited $1.7 million Noe Valley public restroom.
This fragmentation also extends to technology purchasing, where departments operate redundant systems—five separate Microsoft contracts, 20 training systems, and 14 document management platforms—driving up costs and weakening efficiency. As we stare down a historic budget deficit, we must move urgently to be better stewards of taxpayer dollars and protect the core services that San Franciscans rely on.
To address these challenges, the proposed measure will get politics out of contracting by moving more contracting authority from the Board of Supervisors to the City Administrator while preserving appropriate checks and balances from the elected leaders entrusted to serve San Francisco. The improvements to the current system outlined in this measure will restore professionalism to contracting, ensure taxpayer dollars are spent efficiently and transparently, and strengthen the independence of the City Administrator to implement these changes.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
EXTENDING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S DUTIES AND CHANGING CITY CONTRACTING
The Way It is Now
Ordinances Regulating Contracts: The Board of Supervisors (Board) may adopt ordinances that set rules about how the City selects vendors and enters into contracts for the purchase of commodities and services, public works, and grantmaking (collectively, Procurement).
Board Approval of Contracts: With some exceptions, the City's Charter requires the Board to approve contracts for all City departments in three categories: (1) contracts that generate anticipated revenue of $1,000,000 or more for the City, and any amendments to those contracts; (2) contracts that will last more than ten years or cost the City $10,000,000 or more, and amendments to those contracts costing $500,000 or more; and (3) real property leases for ten years or more or that generate $1,000,000 or more, and amendments to those agreements.
City Administrator's Authority Over Contracts and Technology: Under the Charter, the City Administrator acquires commodities and services for City departments, except for the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA), Public Utilities Commission (PUC), Airport Commission (Airport), Port Commission (Port), and some arts departments (Charitable Trust Departments), and as limited by other City laws. The City Administrator also has authority to dispose of City personal property.
The City Administrator also oversees and adopts policies regarding certain aspects of City technology by serving as chair of the Committee on Information Technology and by appointing and managing the City's Chief Information Officer.
City Administrator's Term: The City Administrator is appointed by the Mayor to a five-year term, subject to confirmation by the Board.
The Proposal
Ordinances Regulating Contracts: The measure would give the City Administrator exclusive authority to propose ordinances to the Board governing most aspects of Procurement. Procurement ordinances proposed by the City Administrator would pass unless the Board or the Mayor rejects them within 60 days. The Board could not amend these ordinances.
Board Approval of Contracts: The measure would raise the threshold for Board approval of contracts and amendments to those contracts. For revenue-generating contracts and leases, the threshold would increase from $1,000,000 to $4,500,000. For expenditure contracts, the threshold would increase from $10,000,000 to $25,000,000. Beginning in 2032, the City's Controller would adjust these thresholds every five years for inflation. The Board would also approve amendments to contracts meeting these thresholds where the amendment would result in a cumulative increase of 50% or more of the original contract or lease amount over the amount last approved by the Board.
City Administrator's Authority Over Contracts and Technology: The measure would authorize the City Administrator to adopt Procurement rules and regulations that supersede conflicting department rules, and to establish and implement citywide policy for use of technology.
The MTA, PUC, Airport, Port, and Charitable Trust Departments would be subject to the City Administrator's authority regarding Procurement ordinances and rules, direct acquisition of commodities and services, technology, and disposal of personal property, with some exceptions.
City Administrator's Term: The measure would extend the City Administrator's term from five years to ten years. Show more »
Notice is nearby given that an order entered by The Superior Court of California, San Francisco County on March 23rd, 2026, case number CNC-26-560571, copy of which may re examined at the county clerk in San Francisco County, 400 McAllister Street, room103, San Francisco, CA. 94102-4514, grants me the right to assume the name of Corey Weiner. On May 5, 2026. My address is 719 Larkin Street, #304, San Francisco, CA. 94109. Show more »
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
NOTICE INVITING BIDS
The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (District) seeks bids for Contract No. 2026-D-003, Window Washing Services. Interested Bidders must submit bids by way of upload to the District's Procurement Portal: https://ggbhtd.bonfirehub.com by Friday, May 8, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., PT, at which time bids will be publicly opened and read.
A non-mandatory site visit will be held at the Golden Gate Bridge Administration Building, (1 Toll Plaza, San Francisco 94129) on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT. Attendees should meet in the small parking lot adjacent to building.
Requests for approved equals, modifications or clarifications of any requirement must be submitted in writing by Wednesday, April 22, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. PT.
The Bid Documents are available for download on the District's Procurement Portal. To download and respond to posted solicitations, Proposers will need to register. Once registered, to view and download documents:
1. Go to the District's Procurement Portal: https://ggbhtd.bonfirehub.com.
2. Under "Action" column of "Open Public Opportunities" page, click on "View Opportunity" next to desired Project.
3. Scroll down to "Supporting Documentation" section to download documents.
For general questions regarding this Contract, please contact Senior Buyer, Dodie Goldberg at dgoldberg@goldengate.org.
/s/ Dodie Goldberg, Senior Buyer
Dated: April 2, 2026
4/8/26
CNS-4030294# Show more »
T-Mobile is proposing to collocate antennas and associated equipment on a building located at an address 1000 Grant Avenue, San Francisco, San Francisco County, CA 94133 (Latitude 37° 47' 46.56" N, Longitude 122° 24' 23.53" W). Eocene Environmental Group is publishing this notice in accordance with Federal Communications Commission regulations (47 CFR § 1.1307) for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Parties interested in commenting on this Federal undertaking or with questions on the facility should contact Eocene Environmental Group, Attn: Telecommunications Department, 5930 Grand Avenue, West Des Moines, IA 50266 or call 515-473-6256 (Ref. TMO CA #2538-AM). Show more »
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT (BART)
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR BREATH AND URINE COLLECTION SERVICES
RFP NO. 6M4916
BART is now accepting proposals from breath and urine collection contractors. Interested firms must register on BART's Procurement Portal at https://suppliers.bart.gov
All solicitation documents, including the RFP, must be downloaded directly from the Portal. A Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held on April 17, 2026 at 2:30PM, local time via Zoom – registration is required and instructions are included within the RFP. The District's Equity Program(s) will be explained, and participants can share contact details to network with other firms. The due date for submission of proposals for this RFP is 2:00 PM local time on Tuesday, May 26, 2026. Proposals shall be submitted to the following address:
Attn: District Secretary's Office
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
2150 Webster Street, 10th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
4/4/26
CNS-4029742# Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO.2026-0408824
Fictitious Business Name(s): MAVI,120 4th street San Francisco, CA 94103.
Full name of registrant #1:The Kahve LLC(CA), 1601 S Grant St, San Mateo, 94402. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 06/27/2025
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
March. 23, 2026
Pub Dates:
April. 5, 12, 19, 26, 2026 Show more »
NOTICE OF PROBATE –
Alan Lee Lovejoy
2239 Gum Tree Ln
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Telephone no: 442 340-3040
EMAIL ADDRESS: official@alan-lovejoy.online
Petitioner, Pro Se
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Civic Center Courthouse
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
ESTATE OF Jason David Dennis Dilley
DECEDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO
ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: Jason David Dennis Dilley
CASE No: PES-26-309292
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Jason David Dennis Dilley, also known as Jason Dilley, David Dilley and David Dennis Dilley.
A Petition for Probate has been filed by Alan Lee Lovejoy in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO.
The Petition for Probate requests that Alan Lee Lovejoy, be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held as follows:
Date: April 21, 2026 at 9:00 AM, Room 204, Probate Department, Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO, 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
If you object to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in
Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Alan Lee Lovejoy
2239 Gum Tree Ln
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Telephone no: 442 340-3040
EMAIL ADDRESS: official@alan-lovejoy.online
Publication dates:
April 4, 11, 13, 2026 Show more »
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH
Hillsborough Superior Court Southern District
30 Spring Street
Nashua NH 03060
SUPERIOR COURT
CITATION FOR PUBLICATION Superior Court Rule 4(d)
Zackary Salem and Ashley Salem v IOWN, Inc. 226-2025-CV-00816
Telephone: 1-855-212-1234 TTY/TDD Relay: (800) 735-2964 http://www.courts.state.nh.us
The above entitled action is now pending in this Court. The original pleading is on file and may be examined by interested parties. The Court has issued an Order for Service by Publication on defendant(s) IOWN, Inc.
The Court ORDERS:
Zackary Salem; Ashley Salem shall give notice to IOWN, Inc. of this action by publishing a verified copy of this Citation for Publication once a week for three successive weeks in the San Francisco Chronicle and Nashua Telegraph, a newspaper of general circulation. The last publication shall be on or before May 07, 2026 Also, ON OR BEFORE
30 days after the last publication
May 28, 2026
IOWN, Inc. shall electronically file an Appearance and Answer or other responsive pleading with this Court. A copy of the Appearance and Answer or other responsive pleading must be sent electronically to the party/parties listed below.
Zackary Salem; Ashley Salem shall electronically file the Return of Publication with this Court. Failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed without further notice.
Notice to IOWN, Inc.: If you are working with an attorney, they will guide you on the next steps. If you are going to represent yourself in this action, go to the court's website: www.courts.state.nh.us, select the Electronic Services icon and then select the option for a self-represented party. Complete the registration/log in process then select "I am filing into an existing case". Enter the case number above and click Next. Follow the instructions to complete your filing.
Once you I have responded to the Complaint, you can access documents electronically filed through our Case Access Portal by going to https://odypa.nhecourt.us/portal and following the instructions in the User Guide. In that process you will register, validate your email, request access and approval to view your case. After your information is validated by the court, you will be able to view case information and documents filed in your case.
NHJB-2803-Se (07/01/2018)
This is a Service Document For Case: 226-2025-CV-00816 Hillsborough Superior Court Southern District 3/23/2026 12:03 PM
If you do not comply with these requirements, you will be considered in default and the Court may issue orders that affect you without your input.
Send copies to:
Scott C. Owens, ESQ
First American Law Group 250 First Ave Ste 104 Needham MA 02494
March 23, 2026
(126987)
NHJB-2803-Se (07/01/2018)
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Amy M. Feliciano
Clerk of Court Show more »
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTOR ESTATE OF CYRONE BYRD
Case No. PES-26-309305
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the estate of CYRONE BYRD.
A Petition for Probate has been filed by CHARLES BYRD in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO.
The Petition for Probate requests that CHARLES BYRD, be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held as follows:
Date: April 22, 2026 at 9:00 AM, Dept 204, Probate Department, Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO, 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94124.
If you object to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing a personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of Estate Assets or of any petition or account as provided in probate code section 1250. A request for special notice form is available from the court clerk.
David Schechet
1901 Avenue of the Stars, 2nd Floor,
Los Angeles CA 90067
Telephone no: 310-286-9925
EMAIL ADDRESS: dschechet@earthlink.net
Attorney for: Charles Byrd Show more »
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT REVISED NOTICE TO PROPOSERS – GENERAL INFORMATION March 19, 2026 GRANTS MANAGEMENT SOLUTION PLATFORM SERVICES RFP NO. 6M4905 The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District ("BART") intends to engage the services of up to ONE
* Contractor (CONTRACTOR) to provide Grants Management Solution as indicated within the Request for Proposals ("RFP").
* Accordingly and on behalf of both agencies, BART will be accepting proposals ("Proposals") from proposers ("Proposers") for consideration for the selection of CONSULTANTS to perform the scope of services specified in this RFP. Proposals must be received by BART by 2:00 PM local time on Tuesday, April 14, 2026 . Proposals shall be submitted to the following address: District Secretary's Office San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 2150 Webster Street, 10th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 REQUIRED REGISTRATION ON THE BART PROCUREMENT PORTAL In order for prospective Proposers to be eligible for award of an Agreement being solicited on the BART Procurement Portal, such Proposers are required to be currently registered to do business with BART on the BART Procurement Portal online at https://suppliers.bart.gov and have obtained Solicitation Documents, updates, and any Addenda issued online so as to be added to the Online Planholders List for this solicitation. If a prospective Proposer is a joint venture or partnership, such entity may register on the BART Procurement Portal with the entity's tax identification number (TIN) and download the Solicitation Documents so as to be listed as an online planholder under the entity's name prior to submitting its Proposal. If such entity has not registered on BART Procurement Portal in the name of the joint venture or partnership prior to submitting its Proposal, provided that at least one of the joint venturers or partners registered online on the BART Procurement Portal and downloaded the Solicitation Documents so as to be added to the Online Planholders List for this solicitation, such entity will be required to register with the entity's TIN as an online planholder following the submittal of Proposals, in order for the entity to be eligible for award of this Agreement. PROPOSERS WHO HAVE NOT REGISTERED ON THE BART PROCUREMENT PORTAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL, (OR FOR A JOINT VENTURE OR PARTNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED ABOVE PRIOR TO AWARD) AND DID NOT DOWNLOAD THE SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS FOR THIS SOLICITATION ONLINE SO AS TO BE LISTED AS AN ONLINE PLANHOLDER FOR THIS SOLICITATION, MAY NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR AWARD OF THIS AGREEMENT. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING A Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 1, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. local time via Zoom presentation . All interested parties must RSVP via registering with the Zoom link included within the RFP document in order to participate in this Pre-Proposal Meeting. Should there be difficulties in registering, please contact rae.liu@bart.gov. Instructions on attending the Zoom Presentation are included within the RFP. At the Pre-Proposal Meeting, the District's Equity Program(s) will be explained. Prospective Proposers are requested to make every effort to participate in this only scheduled Pre-Proposal Meeting. At the conclusion of the Pre-Proposal Meeting, participants will be given the opportunity to share their contact information to facilitate networking offline.
3/26/26
CNS-4026584# Show more »
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE
Estate of: Denis Mendoza, Decedent
Case Number: PES-25-309090
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of Denis Mendoza:
A Petition for Probate has been filed by Bianca Vogl in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.
The Petition for Probate requests that Bianca Vogl be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
A hearing on the petition will be held on May 5, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408723
Fictitious Business Name(s): Mirage Tattoo, 687 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: Mirage Tattoo, LLC (CA), 687 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 3/11/26.
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
Mar. 11, 2026
Pub Dates:
Mar. 26, Apr. 2, 9, 16, 2026 Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408611
Fictitious Business Name(s): The Melody of San Francisco, 906 Broadway, San Francisco, CA 94133, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: 908 Broadway LLC (DE), 920 Intracoastal Dr, Unit 1403, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 7/11/2024
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
Feb. 27, 2026
Pub Dates:
Mar. 25, Apr. 1, 8, 15, 2026 Show more »
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ADOPTION OF /
INCREASE IN DEVELOPER FEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 6:15 PM on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, the Board of Trustees ("Board") of the Bayshore Elementary School District will hold a meeting at The Bayshore School located at 155 Oriente Street, Daly City, California 94014 to consider adopting a resolution to increase the existing fee levied on development projects within the District boundaries, pursuant to Education Code section 17620. The proposed Level 1 fee would apply to new residential construction, to new commercial and industrial construction, and to other residential construction where assessable space increases, as permitted by law.
The Board will also review its exemption from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") regarding the adoption of / increase in the fee and consider the adoption of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Education Code section 17621, subd. (a).
Members of the public are invited to provide oral or written comments at the meeting.
The District has made public the information detailing the amount or estimated cost required for the service supported by the fee and the anticipated revenue sources, including general fund revenues. The information can be obtained at The Bayshore School located at 155 Oriente Street, Daly City, California 94014 or by contacting Annette Legaspi, Fiscal Officer, at (415)467-5443 or alegaspi@thebayshoreschool.org
3/25, 4/1/26
CNS-4025060# Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408725
Fictitious Business Name(s): Looking Within, 5 Castro St, San Francisco, CA, 94114, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: Leanna Romero, 5 Castro St, San Francisco, CA, 94114. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 3/02/2026
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
March. 11, 2026
Pub Dates: March 20, 27, April 3, 10, 2026 Show more »
Notice is hereby given to the creditors and contingent creditors of the above-named decedent, who died January 1, 2026, that all persons having claims against the decedent are required to file them with the San Francisco County Superior Court, Probate Division, at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102-4514, and deliver pursuant to Section 1215 of the California Probate Code a copy to Gregory C. Testo, as trustee of the Jerome C. Testo Revocable Trust, wherein the Decedent was the settlor, at c/o Collins Law Corporation, 700 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 199, Larkspur, California 94939, within the later of four months after March 13, 2026 (the date of first publication of notice to creditors), or, if notice is mailed or personally delivered to you, 60 days after the date this notice is mailed or personally delivered to you. A claim form may be obtained from the court clerk. For your protection, you are encouraged to file your claim by certified mail, with return receipt requested.
Dated: March 5, 2026
Brian M. Collins
Collins Law Corporation
700 Larkspur Landing Circle #199
Larkspur, CA 94939 Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026, general election ballot a measure to prevent catastrophic Muni service cuts while investing in making Muni safer, more reliable and affordable.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
The Stronger Muni for All Measure reflects San Franciscans' long-standing commitment to a world-class transit system that gets seniors to their appointments, workers to their jobs, and kids to school.
In the latest available customer satisfaction survey, Muni received its highest scores in 20 years while weekday ridership has rebounded to more than 75% of pre-pandemic levels. But the expiration of state and federal funds and lingering impacts of the Covid economic downturn has created a large budget shortfall. Without securing a reasonable and dedicated source of funding, Muni service will be severely cut, resulting in up to 20 bus routes canceled and doubled wait times. The economic rebound of the past year will be erased and our city will be far less affordable, pushing out more of our neighbors. Further, San Francisco already has the third worst traffic of any city in the United States. Without protecting Muni service, thousands of additional cars will fill the streets, further exacerbating traffic, gridlock, and commute times for transit riders, motorists and cyclists alike.
Over the past year, Muni has demonstrated a new era of fiscal discipline and community engagement. Commonsense reforms have yielded ongoing annual savings of nearly $137 million by eliminating over 500 vacant positions, consolidating operations to eliminate management positions and implementing more efficient operations to get buses to their destinations faster.
This measure proposes a progressively structured parcel tax on commercial and residential properties. 95% of San Francisco's single family residences are capped at $129 annually, with those in larger homes subject to progressively higher rates. The largest commercial properties pay up to $400,000 annually, making sure everyone pays their fair share.
Funds generated by this measure will be subject to strict oversight and accountability requirements, including financial efficiency reviews and oversight by a citizens committee to ensure all revenues are spent on maintaining and improving Muni service.
_______/s/_______ _______/s/_______ _______/s/_______
Kat Siegal Rodney Fong Tony Delorio
Proponents of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
PARCEL TAX TO FUND PUBLIC TRANSIT OPERATIONS
The Way It is Now
The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) is a City department that manages Muni buses, light rail vehicles, streetcars, and cable cars. These services are funded by transit fares, and local, state and federal sources, but not through a parcel tax.
Owners of rent-controlled residential property in the City are generally limited in what costs they can pass onto their tenants.
State law limits the total revenue, including tax revenue, the City may spend each year. The voters may approve increases to this limit for up to four years.
The Proposal
The measure would impose an annual tax on parcels of real property in San Francisco beginning on July 1, 2027, and continuing until June 30, 2042. The tax would be adjusted annually for inflation. The proposed 2027 tax rates would be:
* Single-Family Residential Parcels: Base tax of $129 for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, plus marginal rates of: $0.42 per square foot of building area between 3,001 and 5,000 square feet, and $1.99 per square foot of building area over 5,000 square feet.
* Multifamily Residential Parcels: Base tax of $249 for the first 5,000 square feet of building area, plus a marginal rate of $0.195 per square foot of building area over 5,000 square feet, capped at $50,000 per parcel.
* Non-Residential Parcels: Base tax of $799 for the first 5,000 square feet of building area, plus marginal rates of: $0.76 per square foot of building area between 5,001 and 50,000 square feet, $0.84 per square foot of building area between 50,001 and 250,000 square feet, and $0.99 per square foot of building area over 250,000 square feet, capped at $400,000 per parcel.
* Mixed-Use Parcels: Base tax of $799, plus a combination of the marginal rates for residential and non-residential parcels above if the mixed-use parcel has more than 5,000 square feet of building area, capped at $400,000 per parcel.
* Parcels with No Buildings: No tax if the land area is up to 2,000 square feet, or $392 if the land area is over 2,000 square feet.
The tax would not apply to:
1. Properties or portions of properties not required to pay property taxes based on value; and
2. The building area of any single-room-occupancy unit and any shared facilities.
Most properties owned and occupied as a primary residence by a person who is at least 65 years-old would either be exempt from the tax or entitled to a tax reduction. Owners of rent-controlled residential units could pass through up to 50% of the tax to their tenants, capped at $65 per unit, if the initial base rent was set before June 1, 2027.
Revenues from the tax would be used exclusively for the costs of administering the tax and for SFMTA transit operations.
This measure would increase the City's spending limit for four years. Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408752
Fictitious Business Name(s): Carah Jo, 1032 Irving Street, # 972, San Francisco, CA 94122, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: Original Dime, LLC (CA), 1032 Irving Street, # 972, San Francisco, CA 94122. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 3/13/2026
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
Mar. 13, 2026
Pub Dates:
Mar. 19, 26, April 2, 9, 2026 Show more »
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT (BART)
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR A85 SPECIAL TRACKWORK ASSEMBLY AND GRADING SERVICES, RFP NO. 6M3804
BART is now accepting proposals from qualified firms. Interested firms must register on BART's Procurement Portal at https://suppliers.bart.gov
All solicitation documents, including the RFP, must be downloaded directly from the Portal. A Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 24 2026 at 10 AM local time via Zoom – instructions on registering are included within the RFP. The District's Small Business Program(s) will be explained, and participants can share contact details to network with other firms. The due date for submission of proposals for this RFP is 2:00 PM local time on Tuesday, March 31, 2026. Proposals shall be submitted to the following address:
Attn: District Secretary's Office
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
2150 Webster Street, 10th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
3/19/26
CNS-4023852# Show more »
Sub-Bids Requested from qualified DBE Subcontractors and Suppliers for:
DIGESTER 3 REHABILITATION AND DIGESTER GAS PIPING REPLACEMENT
(CIP #9244)
Owner: Silicon Valley Clean Water, Location: Redwood City, CA
Bid Date: April 16, 2026 @ 2:00 P.M.
Contact: Lori Olivas, lori.olivas@jfshea.com
J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. is soliciting your participation in the preparation of this bid. We are particularly interested in bids from subcontractors/suppliers for the following work items: Demolition, Ready-Mix Concrete, Reinforcing Steel, Structural Steel, Miscellaneous Metals, Roofing, Sealants, Painting & Coatings, ID Devices, Equipment, and Electrical.
Plans and Specifications: Email your request to elizabeth.pettus@jfshea.com. Plans may also be viewed at our Pleasanton office at 4309 Hacienda Drive, Suite 170, Pleasanton, CA 94588. J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. is an equal opportunity employer and intends to negotiate in good faith with interested DBE firms and intends to utilize the lowest responsive bidder. J.F. Shea expects potential subcontractors to be bondable. J.F. Shea will pay for up to 1% for subcontractor bond costs. Subcontractors and Suppliers are expected to bid per plans and specifications, including requirements for warranties. Standard manufacturer's warranties, if not in conformance with owner's specifications, will not be accepted. Show more »
S+B James Construction is seeking subcontractor bids for the Philip & Sala Burton High School Gym, Kitchen, & SPED/STEM Wing Modernization project.
Project Description: Comprehensive alteration of existing Gym and Cafeteria buildings. Interior improvements to existing Instructional Buildings. Site work includes new trash enclosure, fire hydrant, and emergency vehicle access, and accessible path of travel. Trade work to include:
Surveying, Demolition, Hazardous Materials Abatement, Concrete, Wood Framing, Millwork, Miscellaneous Steel, Roofing, Waterproofing, Glass / Glazing, Doors, Frames & Hardware, Drywall, Acoustical Ceilings, Ceramic Tile, Flooring, Painting, Lath & Plaster, Markerboards, Trackable Panels, Toilet Partitions & Accessories, Plumbing, HVAC, Electrical, Low Voltage / Data & Communications, PA System, Audio / Video, Intrusion & Security, Fire Alarm, Earthwork, Paving, Site Concrete, Fencing & Gates, Gym Equipment, Underground Utilities
Project Location: 400 Mansell Street, San Francisco, CA 94134
Project Duration: July 2026 – December 2027
Architect: Lionakis
Project Labor Requirements: Prevailing Wage, Certified Payroll, Skilled and Trained Workforce as defined in Chapter 2.9 (Section 2600et seq.) of the Public Contract Code. There is a Project Labor Agreement that governs trades affiliated with The San Francisco Building & Construction Trades Council. S+B James is signatory to the Carpenters and Laborers Union. All scopes under Carpenters and Laborers must use labor from respective unions.
Contractor Pre-Qualification: Any MEP contractor seeking a subcontract must be prequalified pursuant to Education Code section 17406(a)(2)(C) and Public Contract Code section 20111.6(b) through (m). An "MEP Contractor" is one who will perform work that requires one of the following classes of license: C-4, C-7, C-10, C-16, C-20, C-34, C-36, C-38, C-42, C- 43, or C-46. SFUSD uses PQ Bids to prequalify contractors ( https://go.pqbids/com/ ). Prequalification must be received at least ten (10) business days prior to the RFQ/P due date and approved at least five (5) business days in advance of the bid date.
WBE/MBE/LBE/VETERAN PARTICIPATION: S+B James Construction and SFUSD are committed to the utilization of local, women owned, minority owned, and veteran owned enterprises as contractors and/or suppliers.
Bids Due: April 3, 2026 @2pm
Pre-Bid Conferences & Job Walks (all trades): March 18 @2:30pm & March 19 @11am. Meet at the school main office. Nate Miller is the contact for the job walk. 408-373-8870
Pre-Bid RFIs Due: March 20, 2026 @12pm
Bid Award Criteria: Bids will be evaluated based on a Best-Value Selection. Subcontractors will be chosen based on their ability to provide a combination of quality, efficiency, expertise, and cost-effectiveness. The goal of the best-value selection process is to identify Subcontractors who can deliver a project that meets or exceeds expectations in terms of quality, efficiency, and overall value.
ALL BIDS MUST BE SUBMITTED ON A PROJECT BID FORM AND SIGNED ITB FORM (INCLUDE BREAKOUTS) WHICH CAN BE FOUND IN BUILDING CONNECTED. ITB breakouts are to fit in our GC estimate only and are required by the District.
For an invitation to bid through Building Connected or for general bidding questions, please contact Alyssa Murray alyssamurray@sbjames.com 916-586-1697
For project specific questions, please contact: Estimator: Chris Corbin chriscorbin@sbjames.com 530-228-2138 or Project Manager: Nate Miller natemiller@sbjames.com 408-373-8870 Show more »
SUMMONS
(CITACION JUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:
(AVISO AL DEMANDADO):
JAMES O'LOUGHLIN; DOES 1 THROUGH 50
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
(LO ESTÁ DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
MICHAEL A. WESS and ESTELLA L. WEISS
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts
Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center
(www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 días, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su versión. Lea la información a continuación.
Tiene 30 DÍAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefónica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y más información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede más cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida al secretario de la corte que le dé un formulario de exención de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por encumplimiento y la corte le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin más advertencia.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remisión a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services,
(www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación de $10,000 ó más de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso. Show more »
SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:
(AVISO AL DEMANDADO):
All persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to Cross-Complainants' title, or any cloud upon Cross-Complainants' title thereto.
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
(LO ESTÁ DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
Enrique Cancino
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 días, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su versión. Lea la información a continuación.
Tiene 30 DÍAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefónica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y más información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede más cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida al secretario de la corte que le dé un formulario de exención de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin más advertencia.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remisión a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación de $10,000 ó más de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso.
CASE NUMBER: (Número del Caso): CGC-25-630620
The name and address of the court is:
(El nombre y dirección de la corte es):
San Francisco Superior Court
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
The name, address, and telephone number of plaintiff's attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, is:
(El nombre, la dirección y el número de teléfono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es):
Skye Langs (State Bar No.: 287908) (415) 391.4800
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94104-5500
DATE: (Fecha) 10/27/2025
Clerk, by (Secretario) BENJAMIN YUST, Deputy (Adjunto)
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE ACTION
2774 Union Street, Units 2, 3, and 4, San Francisco, California APN: Block 0947, Lots 048, 049, and 050. Show more »
- Advertisement -