Unfortunately, the listing you're looking for is no longer available.
Similar Listings
CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE OCEAN CAMPUS PARKING GARAGE PROJECT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) has completed a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Draft SEIR) addressing the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed development of a parking garage building on the CCSF Ocean campus.
Updated Facilities Master Plan EIR:
CCSF's Updated Facilities Master Plan EIR was certified by the CCSF Board of Trustees on June 24, 2021 (SCH # 2020090261).
The Draft SEIR for the CCSF Parking Structure Project is now available for review through the College's website: www.ccsf.edu/facilities, and at Rosenberg Library, 50 Frida Kahlo Way, San Francisco, California 94112 and Ingleside Branch Library, 1298 Ocean Ave, San Francisco, CA 94112.
The City College of San Francisco will accept public comments on the Draft SEIR beginning March 17, 2026, through April 30, 2026. Comments on the Draft EIR may be made in writing, with a contact name and return address or email, and should be sent to:
Facilities Construction and Planning City College of San Francisco
50 Frida Kahlo Way, Bungalow 606 San Francisco, CA 94112
or via email to: Facilities@ccsf.edu
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed CCSF Parking Structure Project would be located on a 68,000-square-foot (1.55-acre) site located at 95 Frida Kahlo Way within the CCSF Ocean Campus. The Ocean Campus Parking Structure Project would have a footprint of approximately 200,000 square feet and would consist of five above-ground levels. The parking garage would have a height of up to approximately 52.5 feet to the top of the building parapet. The parking garage would be designed to accommodate the future installation of photovoltaic panels and their associated structures above the building's uppermost deck. The top level of the photovoltaic structure installation would be approximately 58 feet above grade. The parking garage would provide approximately 641 vehicle parking spaces with designated space on the ground floor for the Campus' Police Department (about 4,000 square feet) and Custodial Services (3,500 square feet).
The Draft SEIR serves as a supplement to update the analysis presented in the CCSF's Updated Facilities Master Plan EIR, which was certified by the College on June 24, 2021 (State Clearinghouse No. 2020090261). The Draft SEIR specifically addresses the development of a parking garage at the Ocean Campus and contains additions or changes to the 2021 EIR necessary to evaluate the proposed changes to the Project and changed circumstances under State CEQA Guidelines section 15163 and Public Resources Code section 21166.
POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Based on analysis provided in the Draft SEIR, it was determined that there would be less than significant impacts or no impacts related to aesthetics, air quality, agricultural and forestry resources, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, utilities and service systems, transportation and wildfire. There would be less than significant impacts with mitigation related to cultural resources, biological resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, and tribal cultural resources.
3/17/26
CNS-4022415# Show more »
Refcode: #IPLSFC01301790
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ADOPTION OF /
INCREASE IN DEVELOPER FEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 6:15 PM on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, the Board of Trustees ("Board") of the Bayshore Elementary School District will hold a meeting at The Bayshore School located at 155 Oriente Street, Daly City, California 94014 to consider adopting a resolution to increase the existing fee levied on development projects within the District boundaries, pursuant to Education Code section 17620. The proposed Level 1 fee would apply to new residential construction, to new commercial and industrial construction, and to other residential construction where assessable space increases, as permitted by law.
The Board will also review its exemption from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") regarding the adoption of / increase in the fee and consider the adoption of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Education Code section 17621, subd. (a).
Members of the public are invited to provide oral or written comments at the meeting.
The District has made public the information detailing the amount or estimated cost required for the service supported by the fee and the anticipated revenue sources, including general fund revenues. The information can be obtained at The Bayshore School located at 155 Oriente Street, Daly City, California 94014 or by contacting Annette Legaspi, Fiscal Officer, at (415)467-5443 or alegaspi@thebayshoreschool.org
3/25, 4/1/26
CNS-4025060# Show more »
Refcode: #IPLSFC01310240
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to reform how measures are placed on the ballot in San Francisco.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
The proposed measure reforms how measures are placed on the ballot in San Francisco to better align with the standards in other California cities. San Francisco's ballot qualification rules are far looser than those of any other major California city. The result is bloated and confusing ballots. In November 2024, voters faced 15 separate measures, compared to one in San Jose and three in Oakland.
Over the past 30 years, 74 percent of ordinances on the ballot were placed before voters by a minority of supervisors, the Mayor, or through signature drives rather than through a transparent and accountable legislative process. 44 percent did not legally require voter approval.
San Francisco is the only major city that allows a minority of supervisors to place measures directly on the ballot. It also has by far the lowest signature threshold in California—just 2 percent of registered voters. Additionally, it is the only city that allows the mayor to unliterally place measures on the ballot. Together, the status quo incentivizes special interests and politicians to weaponize the system against each other. Measures are often filled with complicated legal jargon meant to confuse voters. So-called poison pill ballot measures are more and more common, and measures can mislead voters or lead to unintended consequences. In 2022, for example, a ballot measure intended to tax Amazon was later discovered to unintentionally tax hundreds of small businesses and could only be removed through court action, despite conflicting with the drafters' intentions.
The proposed measure aligns San Francisco more closely with other California cities while preserving voters' ability to participate directly in lawmaking. These commonsense reforms encourage coalition-building, deliberation, and higher-quality measures for voters to consider while reducing confusion and unintended consequences.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
CHANGES TO BALLOT MEASURE PROCESS
The Way It Is Now
Under the City Charter, an ordinance or declaration of policy (measure) may be placed on the ballot in several ways, including:
• By a six-member majority vote of the Board of Supervisors (Board);
• By four or more members of the Board submitting the measure without a vote of the Board;
• By the Mayor submitting the measure without a vote of the Board; or
• By registered voters submitting an initiative petition to the Department of Elections (signature initiative) containing signatures of at least 2% of the registered voters in San Francisco, which currently is approximately 10,600 signatures.
A signature initiative generally appears on the ballot at the next regularly scheduled municipal or statewide election. Signature initiatives that propose an ordinance may call for an earlier election, known as a special election, if the petition contains signatures of voters equal in number to at least 10% of the votes cast for all candidates for Mayor in the last mayoral election. The threshold for a signature initiative to call a special election currently is approximately 39,000 signatures.
Once a signature initiative is submitted to the Department of Elections, it cannot be withdrawn.
The Proposal
The proposal would amend the Charter to eliminate the ability of the Mayor or four or more members of the Board to place a measure on the ballot without a vote of the Board. The Board could still place measures on the ballot by a six-member majority vote.
The proposal would change the way the voters may place a signature initiative on the ballot by increasing the required number of voter signatures to 8% of the registered voters in San Francisco, or approximately 42,500 signatures. The proposed measure would also increase the required number of voter signatures to call a special election on an initiative ordinance to 10% of the registered voters in San Francisco (instead of 10% of votes cast for all candidates for Mayor in the last mayoral election), or approximately 53,100 signatures.
The proposal would allow the proponents of a signature initiative to withdraw the signature initiative from the ballot up to 102 days before the election. Show more »
Refcode: #IPLSFC01330770
- Advertisement -