NOTICE OF PROBATE
Michael J. Stecher
SBN 45994
Michael J. Stecher Law Firm
348 Broadway, Suite 2
Millbrae, CA 94030
Telephone: 650-652-9424
Email: mp1944@aol.com
Petitioners: BROOKE MUELLER and WILLIAM GORDON PENNINGTON
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
ESTATE OF GREGORY MICHAEL PENNINGTON, AKA GREGORY M. PENNINGTON, AKA GREGORY PENNINGTON, AKA GREG M. PENNINGTON, AKA GREG PENNINGTON,DECEDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO
ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
GREGORY MICHAEL PENNINGTON, AKA GREGORY M. PENNINGTON, AKA GREGORY
PENNINGTON, AKA GREG M. PENNINGTON, AKA GREG PENNINGTON
CASE No: PES-26-309343
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of GREGORY MICHAEL PENNINGTON, AKA GREGORY M. PENNINGTON, AKA GREGORY PENNINGTON, AKA GREG M. PENNINGTON, AKA GREG PENNINGTON. A Petition for Probate has been filed by BROOKE MUELLER and WILLIAM GORDON PENNINGTON in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO. The Petition for Probate requests that BROOKE MUELLER and WILLIAM GORDON PENNINGTON be appointed as personal representatives to administer the estate of the decedent. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representatives to take many actions without obtaining court approval.
Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representatives will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held as follows:
Date: May 4, 2026 at 9:00 AM, Dept. 204, SUPERIOR COURT
OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
If you object to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing a personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioners:
Michael J. Stecher
348 Broadway, Suite 2
Millbrae, CA 94030
Telephone: 650-652-9424
Publication dates:April 14, 21 and 28, 2026 Show more »
Invitation to Bid for the Yerba Buena Island Treasure Island Road Improvement Project (25/26-08)
The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (Transportation Authority) will receive sealed construction bids for the TREASURE ISLAND ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. The Bid Submission Deadline is Tuesday, May 19, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. (PDT). An electronic bidding process has been adopted for this solicitation. Paper bids will not be accepted. Electronic bids shall be submitted through https://www.bidexpress.com. All bidders must register on https://www.bidexpress.com and create Digital ID through Bid Express to submit a bid. It can take up to five (5) business days to process your Digital ID and it is highly recommended that a Digital ID be active 48 hours in advance of submitting an electronic bid. Costs associated with obtaining said Digital ID and submitting a bid using Bid Express shall be the sole responsibility of the bidder. Contract Documents will be available from https://www.bidexpress.com/solicitations/46499. Any addenda issued for this project will also be available at this website. A link to the Bid Express solicitation page can be obtained at: https://www.sfcta.org/about-us/work-with-us. Bid forms for this work will be found and completed at https://www.bidexpress.com/solicitations/46499.
A non-mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting for the project will be held electronically on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. (PDT) at the virtual meeting platform Zoom. Attendees can register by visiting www.sfcta.org/TIRI-prebid.
Bidder inquiries are due Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. (PDT) at the Transportation Authority's solicitation page at www.bidexpress.com/solicitations/46499, under the section titled "Q&A."
Bids will be opened electronically and read aloud on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. (PDT) at the virtual meeting platform Zoom. Attendees can register by visiting www.sfcta.org/TIRI-bid-opening.
The project consists of reconstruction of Treasure Island Road on Yerba Buena Island, in the City and County of San Francisco. Work includes a new soil nail retaining wall, demolition of existing crib walls and roadway grading, paving, drainage, signing, pavement delineation, street lighting, and concrete barrier. The Engineer's cost estimate is approximately $25,900,000. Work shall be completed within 310 working days. A Class A Contractor's license is required and the successful bidder must pay prevailing wages.
Project funding includes Federal, State and Local sources.
4/15, 4/22/26
CNS-4033147# Show more »
The West Oakland Job Resource Center (WOJRC) is soliciting competitive bids to purchase one battery-electric forklift for use in WOJRC's Transportation Industry training program. The forklift must be battery-powered (lead acid) and have a maximum lifting capacity of 3,000 lbs, along with other specifications articulated in the request for bid documents.
A pre-bid conference call will be held via Zoom on April 14 at 9 a.m. PT, in which WOJRC staff will give participants bid instructions and answer questions. For more information and to register for the pre-bid conference call, contact Tarecq Amer at (510) 419-0509. Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408926
Fictitious Business Name(s): The Shop, 160a Leland Ave., San Francisco, CA. 94134, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: William Shannon, 160a Leland Ave., San Francisco, CA. 94134. This business is conducted by a sole proprietorship.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 4/3/2026
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
April 3, 2026
Pub Dates: April 10, 17, 24, May 1, 2026 Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408786
Fictitious Business Name(s): Anjali Vichare Leadership Consulting, 927 Ortega St, San Francisco, CA 94122, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: Clair Anjali Vichare, 927 Ortega St, San Francisco, CA 94122. This business is conducted by an individual.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 3/11/2026
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
March 18, 2026
Pub Dates:
April 14, 21, 28 and May 5 2026 Show more »
Notice is hereby given that Timothy Daniel Godley has filed a petition with the San Francisco County Superior Court requesting a change of name to Timothy Daniel Rosewall-Godley. Any person who objects to the proposed change must file a written objection with the court before the scheduled hearing date of May 14, 2026. Show more »
NOTICE OF LIEN SALE
IStorage SELF STORAGE
Notice is hereby given pursuant to California Business and Professional Codes # 21700-21716, Section 2328 of the UCC of the Penal Code Section 535 the Under-Signed, IStorage, will sell at public sale on or after said date with bidding to take place on Storage Treasures.com the following misc. goods: Thursday the 16th day of April, 2026 at 10:00AM-
IStorage, 4050 19th Ave, San Francisco, CA 94132-Martell Stevenson
Goods must be paid by credit card, debit card, or money order only and removed within 48 hours of sale. Sale is subject to cancellation in the event of settlement between owner and obligated party. Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408867
Fictitious Business Name(s): Flynn Investments, 1717 Powell Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, CA 94133, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: Flynn Family Investments Inc. 1717 Powell Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, CA 94133, County of San Francisco. This business is conducted by corporation.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 7/31/2020.
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
March 31, 2026
Pub Dates: 4/8, 4/15, 4/22, 4/29/26 Show more »
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
In re MARE ISLAND DRY DOCK, LLC,
Debtor.
Case No. 26-20777-B-11
Chapter 11
NOTICE OF MODIFIED GENERAL CLAIMS BAR DATE
TO ALL CREDITORS, ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the time to file a proof of claim or proof of interest, other than on behalf of a governmental entity, under Rule 3003(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, previously set for June 23, 2026, has been rescheduled and advanced to May 1, 2026. Any non-governmental proofs of claim or interest must be filed with the above-referenced Court on or before May 1, 2026, at 11:59 pm PDT.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a proof of claim is a signed statement describing a creditor's claim. A proof of claim form may be obtained at www.uscourts.gov, www.caeb.uscourts.gov, or at one of the Eastern District of California divisional offices. You may also complete a paperless proof of claim online at www.caeb.uscourts.gov/ElectronicClaims.aspx.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that your claim will be allowed in the amount scheduled unless:
1. your claim is designated as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated;
2. you file a proof of claim in a different amount; or
3. you receive another notice.
If your claim is not scheduled or if your claim is designated as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated, you must file a proof of claim or you might not be paid on your claim and you might be unable to vote on a plan. You may file a proof of claim even if your claim is scheduled.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that you may review the schedules at the bankruptcy clerk's office or online at https://pacer.uscourts.gov or by written request to counsel for the Debtor, Binder Malter Harris & Rome-Banks LLP, at 490 Chadbourne Road, Suite A137, Fairfield, CA 94534.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that secured creditors retain rights in their collateral regardless of whether they file a proof of claim. Filing a proof of claim submits a creditor to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court, with consequences a lawyer can explain. For example, a secured creditor who files a proof of claim may surrender important nonmonetary rights, including the right to a jury trial. Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to improve accountability within the executive branch and allow the Mayor to reorganize certain functions among city departments.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
San Francisco's Charter now spans 548 pages, making it the longest of any major American city. More than 90 percent of City departments are embedded in the Charter itself, meaning even modest organizational improvements require voter approval. Department heads oversee 99 percent of City staff and resources, yet the Mayor has direct hire-and-removal authority over only a small fraction of them. In recent instances involving serious ethical lapses, the Mayor lacked authority to immediately remove department heads. The Charter also requires the Mayor to directly supervise nearly 50 department heads—an impractical structure for a government with more than 30,000 employees. This structure diffuses responsibility and makes it difficult for voters to know who is accountable when services fall short.
The proposed measure restores clear lines of accountability within the executive branch while preserving oversight by the Board of Supervisors. These changes ensure that when San Franciscans elect a Mayor, they know who is responsible for delivering results.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
CHANGES TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH MANAGEMENT
The Way It Is Now
The Mayor is the chief executive officer of the City and is responsible for oversight of all departments and governmental units in the executive branch, which includes most City departments.
The Mayor has authority to transfer functions and reorganize executive branch departments created by ordinance, subject to rejection by the Board of Supervisors. The Mayor may not transfer functions or reorganize department powers and duties established in the City's Charter. Those functions, powers, and duties may be changed only by an amendment to the Charter approved by the voters.
The Mayor may not hire deputy mayors who supervise most departments created in the Charter.
When a department operates under a board or commission established in the Charter, the Mayor typically must select a department head from a list of candidates recommended by the board or commission. For most of those departments, the board or commission may fire the department head but the Mayor may not.
The Mayor, Board of Supervisors, and other elected officials have authority to appoint certain members to the boards and commissions established in the Charter. In most cases, an appointed member may only be suspended or removed for cause, after a process to determine that the member engaged in official misconduct or committed a felony involving moral turpitude.
The Proposal
The proposed measure would allow the Mayor to reorganize executive branch departments that exist under the Charter, with certain exceptions. The Mayor could transfer powers and duties set forth in the Charter, consolidate one or more departments together under a single department head, and assign the oversight of transferred functions to a different commission. The Mayor could not reorganize the functions assigned to the following departments: the City Administrator, Controller, Board of Appeals, Port, Airport, Asian Art Museum, Fine Art Museums, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Public Utilities Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Human Resources, Retirement Board, Health Service System, Department of Elections, Ethics Commission, or departments headed by other elected officials. The duties of the Department of Police Accountability could not be transferred to the Police Department, nor could the duties of the Sheriff's Inspector General be transferred to the Sheriff.
The proposed measure would allow the Mayor to hire deputy mayors.
The proposed measure would expand the Mayor's authority to hire certain department heads without board or commission involvement, and would authorize the Mayor to fire most department heads without board or commission involvement.
The proposed measure would authorize appointing authorities to remove their appointees to most boards and commissions without cause. The following boards and commissions would not be impacted by this change: Board of Appeals, Civil Service Commission, and Ethics Commission. Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to reform how measures are placed on the ballot in San Francisco.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
The proposed measure reforms how measures are placed on the ballot in San Francisco to better align with the standards in other California cities. San Francisco's ballot qualification rules are far looser than those of any other major California city. The result is bloated and confusing ballots. In November 2024, voters faced 15 separate measures, compared to one in San Jose and three in Oakland.
Over the past 30 years, 74 percent of ordinances on the ballot were placed before voters by a minority of supervisors, the Mayor, or through signature drives rather than through a transparent and accountable legislative process. 44 percent did not legally require voter approval.
San Francisco is the only major city that allows a minority of supervisors to place measures directly on the ballot. It also has by far the lowest signature threshold in California—just 2 percent of registered voters. Additionally, it is the only city that allows the mayor to unliterally place measures on the ballot. Together, the status quo incentivizes special interests and politicians to weaponize the system against each other. Measures are often filled with complicated legal jargon meant to confuse voters. So-called poison pill ballot measures are more and more common, and measures can mislead voters or lead to unintended consequences. In 2022, for example, a ballot measure intended to tax Amazon was later discovered to unintentionally tax hundreds of small businesses and could only be removed through court action, despite conflicting with the drafters' intentions.
The proposed measure aligns San Francisco more closely with other California cities while preserving voters' ability to participate directly in lawmaking. These commonsense reforms encourage coalition-building, deliberation, and higher-quality measures for voters to consider while reducing confusion and unintended consequences.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
CHANGES TO BALLOT MEASURE PROCESS
The Way It Is Now
Under the City Charter, an ordinance or declaration of policy (measure) may be placed on the ballot in several ways, including:
• By a six-member majority vote of the Board of Supervisors (Board);
• By four or more members of the Board submitting the measure without a vote of the Board;
• By the Mayor submitting the measure without a vote of the Board; or
• By registered voters submitting an initiative petition to the Department of Elections (signature initiative) containing signatures of at least 2% of the registered voters in San Francisco, which currently is approximately 10,600 signatures.
A signature initiative generally appears on the ballot at the next regularly scheduled municipal or statewide election. Signature initiatives that propose an ordinance may call for an earlier election, known as a special election, if the petition contains signatures of voters equal in number to at least 10% of the votes cast for all candidates for Mayor in the last mayoral election. The threshold for a signature initiative to call a special election currently is approximately 39,000 signatures.
Once a signature initiative is submitted to the Department of Elections, it cannot be withdrawn.
The Proposal
The proposal would amend the Charter to eliminate the ability of the Mayor or four or more members of the Board to place a measure on the ballot without a vote of the Board. The Board could still place measures on the ballot by a six-member majority vote.
The proposal would change the way the voters may place a signature initiative on the ballot by increasing the required number of voter signatures to 8% of the registered voters in San Francisco, or approximately 42,500 signatures. The proposed measure would also increase the required number of voter signatures to call a special election on an initiative ordinance to 10% of the registered voters in San Francisco (instead of 10% of votes cast for all candidates for Mayor in the last mayoral election), or approximately 53,100 signatures.
The proposal would allow the proponents of a signature initiative to withdraw the signature initiative from the ballot up to 102 days before the election. Show more »
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the person whose name appears hereon of their intention to circulate a petition within the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of placing on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot a measure to make City contracting more efficient and professional by centralizing contracting oversight with the City Administrator, and giving the City Administrator authority to set citywide standards while preserving appropriate safeguards.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
San Francisco's contracting system has become overly complex, politicized, and inefficient. The status quo rewards insiders and special interests, and, at its worst, it breeds corruption. Over $5 billion in annual contracts are governed by a maze of rules scattered across more than 100 sections of code. "Procurement" and "contracting" appear more than 9,000 times in City law, and the Board of Supervisors has adopted 21 procurement-related ordinances in the last five years alone.
The result is a system so complicated that the City has created 39 waivers just to allow essential purchases to move forward. It costs roughly $25,000 to conduct a single procurement process—even if the total value of the contract itself is only $25,000—and many contracts take six to twelve months to complete. More than 14 departments can be involved in approving a single contract. In extreme cases, overlapping approvals and layered rules have driven up costs dramatically, as illustrated by the widely cited $1.7 million Noe Valley public restroom.
This fragmentation also extends to technology purchasing, where departments operate redundant systems—five separate Microsoft contracts, 20 training systems, and 14 document management platforms—driving up costs and weakening efficiency. As we stare down a historic budget deficit, we must move urgently to be better stewards of taxpayer dollars and protect the core services that San Franciscans rely on.
To address these challenges, the proposed measure will get politics out of contracting by moving more contracting authority from the Board of Supervisors to the City Administrator while preserving appropriate checks and balances from the elected leaders entrusted to serve San Francisco. The improvements to the current system outlined in this measure will restore professionalism to contracting, ensure taxpayer dollars are spent efficiently and transparently, and strengthen the independence of the City Administrator to implement these changes.
_/s/________________
Daniel Lurie
Proponent of the Initiative
The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
EXTENDING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S DUTIES AND CHANGING CITY CONTRACTING
The Way It is Now
Ordinances Regulating Contracts: The Board of Supervisors (Board) may adopt ordinances that set rules about how the City selects vendors and enters into contracts for the purchase of commodities and services, public works, and grantmaking (collectively, Procurement).
Board Approval of Contracts: With some exceptions, the City's Charter requires the Board to approve contracts for all City departments in three categories: (1) contracts that generate anticipated revenue of $1,000,000 or more for the City, and any amendments to those contracts; (2) contracts that will last more than ten years or cost the City $10,000,000 or more, and amendments to those contracts costing $500,000 or more; and (3) real property leases for ten years or more or that generate $1,000,000 or more, and amendments to those agreements.
City Administrator's Authority Over Contracts and Technology: Under the Charter, the City Administrator acquires commodities and services for City departments, except for the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA), Public Utilities Commission (PUC), Airport Commission (Airport), Port Commission (Port), and some arts departments (Charitable Trust Departments), and as limited by other City laws. The City Administrator also has authority to dispose of City personal property.
The City Administrator also oversees and adopts policies regarding certain aspects of City technology by serving as chair of the Committee on Information Technology and by appointing and managing the City's Chief Information Officer.
City Administrator's Term: The City Administrator is appointed by the Mayor to a five-year term, subject to confirmation by the Board.
The Proposal
Ordinances Regulating Contracts: The measure would give the City Administrator exclusive authority to propose ordinances to the Board governing most aspects of Procurement. Procurement ordinances proposed by the City Administrator would pass unless the Board or the Mayor rejects them within 60 days. The Board could not amend these ordinances.
Board Approval of Contracts: The measure would raise the threshold for Board approval of contracts and amendments to those contracts. For revenue-generating contracts and leases, the threshold would increase from $1,000,000 to $4,500,000. For expenditure contracts, the threshold would increase from $10,000,000 to $25,000,000. Beginning in 2032, the City's Controller would adjust these thresholds every five years for inflation. The Board would also approve amendments to contracts meeting these thresholds where the amendment would result in a cumulative increase of 50% or more of the original contract or lease amount over the amount last approved by the Board.
City Administrator's Authority Over Contracts and Technology: The measure would authorize the City Administrator to adopt Procurement rules and regulations that supersede conflicting department rules, and to establish and implement citywide policy for use of technology.
The MTA, PUC, Airport, Port, and Charitable Trust Departments would be subject to the City Administrator's authority regarding Procurement ordinances and rules, direct acquisition of commodities and services, technology, and disposal of personal property, with some exceptions.
City Administrator's Term: The measure would extend the City Administrator's term from five years to ten years. Show more »
Notice is nearby given that an order entered by The Superior Court of California, San Francisco County on March 23rd, 2026, case number CNC-26-560571, copy of which may re examined at the county clerk in San Francisco County, 400 McAllister Street, room103, San Francisco, CA. 94102-4514, grants me the right to assume the name of Corey Weiner. On May 5, 2026. My address is 719 Larkin Street, #304, San Francisco, CA. 94109. Show more »
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
NOTICE INVITING BIDS
The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (District) seeks bids for Contract No. 2026-D-003, Window Washing Services. Interested Bidders must submit bids by way of upload to the District's Procurement Portal: https://ggbhtd.bonfirehub.com by Friday, May 8, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., PT, at which time bids will be publicly opened and read.
A non-mandatory site visit will be held at the Golden Gate Bridge Administration Building, (1 Toll Plaza, San Francisco 94129) on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT. Attendees should meet in the small parking lot adjacent to building.
Requests for approved equals, modifications or clarifications of any requirement must be submitted in writing by Wednesday, April 22, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. PT.
The Bid Documents are available for download on the District's Procurement Portal. To download and respond to posted solicitations, Proposers will need to register. Once registered, to view and download documents:
1. Go to the District's Procurement Portal: https://ggbhtd.bonfirehub.com.
2. Under "Action" column of "Open Public Opportunities" page, click on "View Opportunity" next to desired Project.
3. Scroll down to "Supporting Documentation" section to download documents.
For general questions regarding this Contract, please contact Senior Buyer, Dodie Goldberg at dgoldberg@goldengate.org.
/s/ Dodie Goldberg, Senior Buyer
Dated: April 2, 2026
4/8/26
CNS-4030294# Show more »
T-Mobile is proposing to collocate antennas and associated equipment on a building located at an address 1000 Grant Avenue, San Francisco, San Francisco County, CA 94133 (Latitude 37° 47' 46.56" N, Longitude 122° 24' 23.53" W). Eocene Environmental Group is publishing this notice in accordance with Federal Communications Commission regulations (47 CFR § 1.1307) for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Parties interested in commenting on this Federal undertaking or with questions on the facility should contact Eocene Environmental Group, Attn: Telecommunications Department, 5930 Grand Avenue, West Des Moines, IA 50266 or call 515-473-6256 (Ref. TMO CA #2538-AM). Show more »
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT (BART)
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR BREATH AND URINE COLLECTION SERVICES
RFP NO. 6M4916
BART is now accepting proposals from breath and urine collection contractors. Interested firms must register on BART's Procurement Portal at https://suppliers.bart.gov
All solicitation documents, including the RFP, must be downloaded directly from the Portal. A Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held on April 17, 2026 at 2:30PM, local time via Zoom – registration is required and instructions are included within the RFP. The District's Equity Program(s) will be explained, and participants can share contact details to network with other firms. The due date for submission of proposals for this RFP is 2:00 PM local time on Tuesday, May 26, 2026. Proposals shall be submitted to the following address:
Attn: District Secretary's Office
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
2150 Webster Street, 10th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
4/4/26
CNS-4029742# Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO.2026-0408824
Fictitious Business Name(s): MAVI,120 4th street San Francisco, CA 94103.
Full name of registrant #1:The Kahve LLC(CA), 1601 S Grant St, San Mateo, 94402. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 06/27/2025
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
March. 23, 2026
Pub Dates:
April. 5, 12, 19, 26, 2026 Show more »
NOTICE OF PROBATE –
Alan Lee Lovejoy
2239 Gum Tree Ln
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Telephone no: 442 340-3040
EMAIL ADDRESS: official@alan-lovejoy.online
Petitioner, Pro Se
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Civic Center Courthouse
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
ESTATE OF Jason David Dennis Dilley
DECEDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO
ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: Jason David Dennis Dilley
CASE No: PES-26-309292
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Jason David Dennis Dilley, also known as Jason Dilley, David Dilley and David Dennis Dilley.
A Petition for Probate has been filed by Alan Lee Lovejoy in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO.
The Petition for Probate requests that Alan Lee Lovejoy, be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held as follows:
Date: April 21, 2026 at 9:00 AM, Room 204, Probate Department, Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO, 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
If you object to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in
Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Alan Lee Lovejoy
2239 Gum Tree Ln
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Telephone no: 442 340-3040
EMAIL ADDRESS: official@alan-lovejoy.online
Publication dates:
April 4, 11, 13, 2026 Show more »
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH
Hillsborough Superior Court Southern District
30 Spring Street
Nashua NH 03060
SUPERIOR COURT
CITATION FOR PUBLICATION Superior Court Rule 4(d)
Zackary Salem and Ashley Salem v IOWN, Inc. 226-2025-CV-00816
Telephone: 1-855-212-1234 TTY/TDD Relay: (800) 735-2964 http://www.courts.state.nh.us
The above entitled action is now pending in this Court. The original pleading is on file and may be examined by interested parties. The Court has issued an Order for Service by Publication on defendant(s) IOWN, Inc.
The Court ORDERS:
Zackary Salem; Ashley Salem shall give notice to IOWN, Inc. of this action by publishing a verified copy of this Citation for Publication once a week for three successive weeks in the San Francisco Chronicle and Nashua Telegraph, a newspaper of general circulation. The last publication shall be on or before May 07, 2026 Also, ON OR BEFORE
30 days after the last publication
May 28, 2026
IOWN, Inc. shall electronically file an Appearance and Answer or other responsive pleading with this Court. A copy of the Appearance and Answer or other responsive pleading must be sent electronically to the party/parties listed below.
Zackary Salem; Ashley Salem shall electronically file the Return of Publication with this Court. Failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed without further notice.
Notice to IOWN, Inc.: If you are working with an attorney, they will guide you on the next steps. If you are going to represent yourself in this action, go to the court's website: www.courts.state.nh.us, select the Electronic Services icon and then select the option for a self-represented party. Complete the registration/log in process then select "I am filing into an existing case". Enter the case number above and click Next. Follow the instructions to complete your filing.
Once you I have responded to the Complaint, you can access documents electronically filed through our Case Access Portal by going to https://odypa.nhecourt.us/portal and following the instructions in the User Guide. In that process you will register, validate your email, request access and approval to view your case. After your information is validated by the court, you will be able to view case information and documents filed in your case.
NHJB-2803-Se (07/01/2018)
This is a Service Document For Case: 226-2025-CV-00816 Hillsborough Superior Court Southern District 3/23/2026 12:03 PM
If you do not comply with these requirements, you will be considered in default and the Court may issue orders that affect you without your input.
Send copies to:
Scott C. Owens, ESQ
First American Law Group 250 First Ave Ste 104 Needham MA 02494
March 23, 2026
(126987)
NHJB-2803-Se (07/01/2018)
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Amy M. Feliciano
Clerk of Court Show more »
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTOR ESTATE OF CYRONE BYRD
Case No. PES-26-309305
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the estate of CYRONE BYRD.
A Petition for Probate has been filed by CHARLES BYRD in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO.
The Petition for Probate requests that CHARLES BYRD, be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held as follows:
Date: April 22, 2026 at 9:00 AM, Dept 204, Probate Department, Superior Court of California, County of SAN FRANCISCO, 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94124.
If you object to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing a personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of Estate Assets or of any petition or account as provided in probate code section 1250. A request for special notice form is available from the court clerk.
David Schechet
1901 Avenue of the Stars, 2nd Floor,
Los Angeles CA 90067
Telephone no: 310-286-9925
EMAIL ADDRESS: dschechet@earthlink.net
Attorney for: Charles Byrd Show more »
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT REVISED NOTICE TO PROPOSERS – GENERAL INFORMATION March 19, 2026 GRANTS MANAGEMENT SOLUTION PLATFORM SERVICES RFP NO. 6M4905 The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District ("BART") intends to engage the services of up to ONE
* Contractor (CONTRACTOR) to provide Grants Management Solution as indicated within the Request for Proposals ("RFP").
* Accordingly and on behalf of both agencies, BART will be accepting proposals ("Proposals") from proposers ("Proposers") for consideration for the selection of CONSULTANTS to perform the scope of services specified in this RFP. Proposals must be received by BART by 2:00 PM local time on Tuesday, April 14, 2026 . Proposals shall be submitted to the following address: District Secretary's Office San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 2150 Webster Street, 10th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 REQUIRED REGISTRATION ON THE BART PROCUREMENT PORTAL In order for prospective Proposers to be eligible for award of an Agreement being solicited on the BART Procurement Portal, such Proposers are required to be currently registered to do business with BART on the BART Procurement Portal online at https://suppliers.bart.gov and have obtained Solicitation Documents, updates, and any Addenda issued online so as to be added to the Online Planholders List for this solicitation. If a prospective Proposer is a joint venture or partnership, such entity may register on the BART Procurement Portal with the entity's tax identification number (TIN) and download the Solicitation Documents so as to be listed as an online planholder under the entity's name prior to submitting its Proposal. If such entity has not registered on BART Procurement Portal in the name of the joint venture or partnership prior to submitting its Proposal, provided that at least one of the joint venturers or partners registered online on the BART Procurement Portal and downloaded the Solicitation Documents so as to be added to the Online Planholders List for this solicitation, such entity will be required to register with the entity's TIN as an online planholder following the submittal of Proposals, in order for the entity to be eligible for award of this Agreement. PROPOSERS WHO HAVE NOT REGISTERED ON THE BART PROCUREMENT PORTAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL, (OR FOR A JOINT VENTURE OR PARTNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED ABOVE PRIOR TO AWARD) AND DID NOT DOWNLOAD THE SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS FOR THIS SOLICITATION ONLINE SO AS TO BE LISTED AS AN ONLINE PLANHOLDER FOR THIS SOLICITATION, MAY NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR AWARD OF THIS AGREEMENT. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING A Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 1, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. local time via Zoom presentation . All interested parties must RSVP via registering with the Zoom link included within the RFP document in order to participate in this Pre-Proposal Meeting. Should there be difficulties in registering, please contact rae.liu@bart.gov. Instructions on attending the Zoom Presentation are included within the RFP. At the Pre-Proposal Meeting, the District's Equity Program(s) will be explained. Prospective Proposers are requested to make every effort to participate in this only scheduled Pre-Proposal Meeting. At the conclusion of the Pre-Proposal Meeting, participants will be given the opportunity to share their contact information to facilitate networking offline.
3/26/26
CNS-4026584# Show more »
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE
Estate of: Denis Mendoza, Decedent
Case Number: PES-25-309090
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of Denis Mendoza:
A Petition for Probate has been filed by Bianca Vogl in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.
The Petition for Probate requests that Bianca Vogl be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
A hearing on the petition will be held on May 5, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408723
Fictitious Business Name(s): Mirage Tattoo, 687 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: Mirage Tattoo, LLC (CA), 687 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 3/11/26.
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
Mar. 11, 2026
Pub Dates:
Mar. 26, Apr. 2, 9, 16, 2026 Show more »
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 2026-0408611
Fictitious Business Name(s): The Melody of San Francisco, 906 Broadway, San Francisco, CA 94133, County of San Francisco. Full name of registrant #1: 908 Broadway LLC (DE), 920 Intracoastal Dr, Unit 1403, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304. This business is conducted by a limited liability company.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the above-listed fictitious business name on 7/11/2024
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Francisco on:
Feb. 27, 2026
Pub Dates:
Mar. 25, Apr. 1, 8, 15, 2026 Show more »
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ADOPTION OF /
INCREASE IN DEVELOPER FEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 6:15 PM on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, the Board of Trustees ("Board") of the Bayshore Elementary School District will hold a meeting at The Bayshore School located at 155 Oriente Street, Daly City, California 94014 to consider adopting a resolution to increase the existing fee levied on development projects within the District boundaries, pursuant to Education Code section 17620. The proposed Level 1 fee would apply to new residential construction, to new commercial and industrial construction, and to other residential construction where assessable space increases, as permitted by law.
The Board will also review its exemption from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") regarding the adoption of / increase in the fee and consider the adoption of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Education Code section 17621, subd. (a).
Members of the public are invited to provide oral or written comments at the meeting.
The District has made public the information detailing the amount or estimated cost required for the service supported by the fee and the anticipated revenue sources, including general fund revenues. The information can be obtained at The Bayshore School located at 155 Oriente Street, Daly City, California 94014 or by contacting Annette Legaspi, Fiscal Officer, at (415)467-5443 or alegaspi@thebayshoreschool.org
3/25, 4/1/26
CNS-4025060# Show more »
- Advertisement -